Multiple Choice, Single Answer looks like the simplest Reading task on the exam: one passage, one question, one correct option. The difficulty sits in the distractors, which are built to repeat the passage's own words while quietly distorting what those words actually claim. This guide covers the format, the all-or-nothing scoring, and a worked example that walks through eliminating each wrong option.
Multiple Choice, Single Answer Practice Questions
Read the passage and choose one answer. Practise with answers and explanations for PTE Academic. Review your mistakes and repeat each question to build confidence.
PTE Core version of this page262 questions · PTE Academic
What Multiple Choice, Single Answer is
Multiple Choice, Single Answer (Reading) appears in the Reading section of both PTE Academic and PTE Core. You read a passage, then answer a question with exactly one correct option among several choices. In our experience, the question may target the passage's main idea, a specific stated detail, the writer's purpose, or something the passage implies without stating outright.
Because only one option is correct, the task rewards precision over breadth. A candidate who reads carefully for the question's specific target usually outperforms one who reads the whole passage for general understanding and then guesses which option feels most familiar. In practice, the wrong options are rarely equally implausible: some are close paraphrases that quietly change the meaning, while others are unrelated enough to eliminate quickly.
Format and timing
The maximum passage length differs sharply between the two exams for this task — Academic passages can run to 300 words against 110 on Core, nearly three times as long — while the item count and the interaction stay close.
There is no separate timer for a single item. This task, like the rest of Reading, shares the section's overall clock, which runs about 23-30 minutes on PTE Academic and about 27-37 minutes on PTE Core.
| Detail | PTE Academic | PTE Core |
|---|---|---|
| Items per test | 2-3 | 1-2 |
| Passage length | Up to 300 words | Up to 110 words |
| Assessed skill | Reading | Reading |
| Per-item timer | None — shares the Reading section clock | None — shares the Reading section clock |
How it is scored
Scoring is correct or incorrect with no partial credit: you earn one point for selecting the single correct option, and nothing for selecting any other option or leaving the question unanswered.
This makes the task unforgiving of a near-miss — coming close to the right idea earns exactly the same score as being completely wrong. It also means there is no cost beyond the missed point for selecting an incorrect option, so leaving an item unanswered is never better than making your best-reasoned guess.
Step-by-step method
The routine below is our suggestion, not an official procedure. It keeps you working from the question's target and from evidence in the passage, and it deliberately delays your final choice until every option has been tested, because the most tempting distractor is usually the one you meet first.
- Read the question before the passage, and decide what kind of answer it needs: a main idea, a specific detail, a stated purpose, or an inference.
- Read the passage with that specific target in mind, rather than trying to absorb every detail equally.
- Locate the exact sentence or phrase in the passage that would support the correct answer, if you can.
- Go through every option, even after one looks correct, and reject any that contradict the passage or introduce a claim the passage never makes.
- Be especially cautious of an option that repeats the passage's exact wording but attaches it to a different subject or a different relationship than the passage describes.
- Select your final answer only after this elimination pass, not after your first read of the options.
Worked example
Example (written by LexiPTE). This passage and question are an original exercise, not a real exam item, built to show how to eliminate close distractors.
Passage: "When a regional airline introduced a simplified boarding process at its busiest airport, average delay times fell by nearly a third within six months. Executives credited the change to fewer passengers needing gate assistance, since the new process let most travellers board without staff intervention. The airline has since begun testing the same process at two smaller airports, though early data there is limited."
Question: According to the passage, why did delay times improve? Options: (A) The airline hired more gate staff to speed up boarding. (B) Fewer travellers needed staff help under the new process. (C) The airline reduced the number of flights at its busiest airport. (D) Passengers were required to check in earlier than before.
The correct answer is B. It directly restates the passage's stated reason: "fewer passengers needing gate assistance" because the new process let most travellers board without staff intervention.
Option A is wrong because the passage never mentions hiring more staff — if anything, the passage implies staff intervention decreased, not increased. Option C introduces a claim about flight numbers that the passage does not make at all. Option D invents an earlier check-in requirement that has no basis in the text. Each wrong option borrows a plausible-sounding idea from the general topic of airline delays, but none of them is the reason the passage actually gives.
Strategies that work
- Identify the question type before you read the passage in detail — main idea questions need a different reading approach than detail or inference questions.
- Look for the specific evidence sentence rather than relying on your overall impression of the passage.
- Treat any option that seems to require outside knowledge, rather than something stated or clearly implied in the passage, as a strong candidate for elimination.
- Check the option that looks correct against the other options one more time before finalising your answer, since a close distractor is often designed to be picked first.
Common mistakes
- Selecting an option because it reuses the passage's own words, without checking whether it reuses them accurately.
- Answering from general knowledge about the topic instead of from what the specific passage states.
- Confusing the passage's main idea with one of its supporting details when the question asks specifically for one or the other.
- Stopping at the first plausible option instead of checking every option against the text.
Practice plan
- For every practice question, underline or note the exact sentence in the passage that proves the correct answer, and do the same for why each wrong option fails.
- Practise separately on main-idea questions and detail questions, since the reading strategy for each is slightly different, before mixing them together.
- Time yourself against the Reading section as a whole rather than this task in isolation, since Pearson does not allot separate time to it.
- Review any item you got wrong by identifying whether you missed the passage's evidence or were misled by a close distractor — the fix is different for each cause.
- Keep a short log of the distractor patterns that catch you out most often, such as a detail attached to the wrong subject or a stated fact stretched into an unstated conclusion, and check that log before longer practice sets.